The central question

Can Canada and Egypt turn their economic advantages into a much larger investment partnership?

Follow the history, see who holds each advantage, and examine how both countries could turn established relationships into lasting economic value.

01 / The finding

A rich history.
Different strengths.

The relationship already has operating experience, institutions and investment lessons to draw upon.

Canada leads on economic scale, innovation and bilateral goods exports. Egypt leads on population and recorded growth. Historic deals confirm capital and expertise have crossed in both directions.

Ten different measures do not produce one overall winner. Historical acquisitions, current investment stocks and annual trade cannot be added together.

Inspect the scorecard ↓
GOODS TRADE · 2025C$967MTwo-way merchandise trade; +22.4% versus 2024.
INVESTMENT PROTECTIONSince 1997Bilateral treaty in force; distinct from a free trade agreement.
INVESTMENT EXPERIENCEBoth directionsCompleted investments, exits and planned projects are classified separately.

02 / The relationship, in context

More than seventy years.
Now leverage the experience.

The turning points show what has worked, where investment faced obstacles and which capabilities can be expanded.

1952

Commercial rules precede diplomacy

Reciprocal trade treatment provides an early institutional foundation.

Treaty / historic

1954–57

Diplomacy and Suez

Diplomatic relations begin in 1954; the Suez peacekeeping experience becomes a major chapter in the relationship.

Foundation

1996–97

Investment protection

The investment treaty is signed in 1996 and enters into force in 1997.

In force

2007

Capital moves both ways

Egyptian-backed investors acquire Canadian-listed Rally Energy; Methanex advances Damietta methanol investment.

Investments

2009–11

Telecom and industry scale

Egyptian-backed WIND Mobile launches in Canada and the Damietta methanol plant begins operation.

Operating history

2013–14

Barriers and exits

Canada blocks the proposed Allstream acquisition; foreign investors later exit WIND.

Blocked / exited

2018–21

New capabilities

Canadian-linked higher education expands and Barrick receives gold exploration licences.

Education / exploration

2025

Trade grows

Two-way merchandise trade reaches approximately C$967 million.

Measured trade

2026

Extend existing relationships

Methanex signs a skills-cooperation agreement; Avelon signs a planned textiles project.

Agreement / planned

The timeline distinguishes operating assets, completed transactions, blocked transactions and proposed investment. These are not equivalent outcomes.

03 / Bilateral goods trade · verified comparison

Is Canada–Egypt trade gaining momentum?

Official Canadian figures show how merchandise trade changed between 2024 and 2025, in both directions.

Evidence: 2024 and 2025 customs-based Canadian merchandise trade, rounded to C$ millions, from Global Affairs Canada. An earlier unverified ten-year chart has been removed rather than treated as primary-verified. Official 2025 trade tables ↗

Bilateral goods trade / 2024–2025

Two directions. One verified comparison.

Canada-reported merchandise trade, C$ millions. Annual customs-based goods; amounts rounded to nearest million.

Canada → EgyptEgypt → Canada
02004006002024 Canada to Egypt: C$464 million4642024 Egypt to Canada: C$326 million32620242025 Canada to Egypt: C$537 million5372025 Egypt to Canada: C$430 million4302025
View the verified figures and calculations
YearCanada → EgyptEgypt → CanadaTotal goods trade
2024C$464mC$326mC$790m (rounded components)
2025C$537mC$430mC$967m

What it shows: Canada recorded growth in both merchandise export directions in 2025. The 2024 decline in Canadian imports from Egypt was largely gold-related; it should not be misread as an economy-wide contraction of Egyptian exports.

Source: Global Affairs Canada, 2025 merchandise trade review, Figures 25–26: 2024 and 2025 Canada–Egypt trade amounts. Exact 2025 total is C$967.0m, with Canadian exports C$536.6m; rounded component sums need not match exact underlying totals. Official 2024 gold context.

The strategic implication

Trade is measurable. Investment depth needs better bilateral data.

The verified two-year trade comparison shows actual goods exchanged between Canada and Egypt. Selected historical deals illustrate investment relationships but are not annual bilateral FDI flows; do not add transaction amounts across years.

04 / Worldwide investment attraction

Two economies.
One global investment comparison.

How much FDI does each country attract from investors worldwide, relative to the size of its economy? This is a like-for-like comparison—not Canada–Egypt investment flows.

Worldwide inward FDI · 10-year comparison

Canada vs Egypt · 2016–2025

Worldwide net inward FDI as a share of each country's GDP, 2016–2025. This normalizes for different economic sizes.

CanadaEgypt
0%3%6%9%12%2016201820202022202420252016: Canada worldwide inward FDI 2.2% of GDP2017: Canada worldwide inward FDI 1.5% of GDP2018: Canada worldwide inward FDI 2.5% of GDP2019: Canada worldwide inward FDI 2.8% of GDP2020: Canada worldwide inward FDI 1.8% of GDP2021: Canada worldwide inward FDI 3.0% of GDP2022: Canada worldwide inward FDI 2.3% of GDP2023: Canada worldwide inward FDI 2.0% of GDP2024: Canada worldwide inward FDI 2.8% of GDP2025: Canada worldwide inward FDI 3.0% of GDP2016: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 1.7% of GDP2017: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 1.2% of GDP2018: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 2.4% of GDP2019: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 3.0% of GDP2020: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 3.1% of GDP2021: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 2.8% of GDP2022: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 1.5% of GDP2023: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 1.2% of GDP2024: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 12.0% of GDP2025: Egypt worldwide inward FDI 4.2% of GDP

Swipe the chart horizontally to see all ten years (2016–2025). The complete figures are also available in the table below.

View exact annual figures
YearCanadaEgypt
20162.2% of GDP1.7% of GDP
20171.5% of GDP1.2% of GDP
20182.5% of GDP2.4% of GDP
20192.8% of GDP3.0% of GDP
20201.8% of GDP3.1% of GDP
20213.0% of GDP2.8% of GDP
20222.3% of GDP1.5% of GDP
20232.0% of GDP1.2% of GDP
20242.8% of GDP12.0% of GDP
20253.0% of GDP4.2% of GDP

What it shows: Both countries experienced changing global FDI-attraction intensity; Egypt’s exceptional 2024 spike is linked to extraordinary transactions, and its 2025 rate was 4.2% versus Canada’s 3.0%. This does not measure Canada–Egypt capital flows.

Data: World Bank World Development Indicators, FDI net inflows (% GDP), Canada and Egypt ↗. Values displayed to one decimal. The series is annual net flow, not FDI stock, commitments, or a project count. The exceptional Egyptian 2024 result reflects major UAE-linked investment, not Canadian investment.

05 / Two-way investment inventory

Who put capital
into what?

A record of completed acquisitions, operating investments, planned projects and commercial cooperation. Each is labelled by what actually occurred; these are not today’s investment holdings.

The overall picture

Two-way

Documented historic investment activity

A current, reconciled bilateral stock total cannot be confirmed and is intentionally not reported.

Canada → Egypt

Industry

Methanol, education, exploration and planned manufacturing.

Egypt → Canada

Corporate deals

Telecom participation and corporate acquisitions, including exits and a blocked proposal.

Transaction amounts, project budgets and historical acquisition prices are not a current investment stock and cannot be summed.

8 selected capital, ownership, rights and cooperation records shown

2007–11 · Methanol

Capital / operating asset

Methanex → Damietta

Canada flagEgypt flagCanada → Egypt

1.3m tonnes/year capacity

Completed project; operating

Operating since 2011 with up to 1.3 million tonnes annual capacity. Methanex reports 50% ownership today; this capacity is not a dollar value or a measure of Canadian capital deployed.

2007 · Energy acquisition

Capital / acquisition

Qalaa / NOPC → Rally Energy

Egypt flagCanada flagEgypt → Canadian business

US$868m reported

Completed acquisition; assets largely outside Canada

An Egyptian-backed purchase of a Canadian company; underlying producing assets were largely outside Canada.

2008–14 · Telecommunications

Capital / historic telecom

Orascom / GTH → WIND Mobile

Egypt flagCanada flagEgypt → Canadian business

Not aggregated

Investment subsequently exited

Egyptian-backed entry into Canadian wireless. Investors exited; not a current Egyptian ownership position.

2013 · Telecommunications

Proposed / not completed

Accelero → Allstream

Egypt flagCanada flagEgypt → Canadian business

C$520m proposed

Blocked acquisition; no completed investment

The proposed acquisition was prevented following a Canadian national-security review.

2018 · Education

Institutional / ownership unconfirmed

Universities of Canada in Egypt

Canada flagEgypt flagCanada → Egypt

Not confirmed

Education presence; amount and capital ownership unverified

Canadian education affiliation in Egypt; equity provenance and capital amount not independently confirmed.

2021 · Exploration

Commercial rights / exploration

Barrick → exploration licences

Canada flagEgypt flagCanada → Egypt

US$8.8m announced

Exploration contracts; planned spending

Four contracts covering 19 blocks were signed in 2021. Egypt’s petroleum ministry stated expected investment of approximately US$8.8m; actual expenditure and producing assets are not established by this announcement.

2026 · Industrial skills

Cooperation / no capital amount

Methanex → capacity building

Canada flagEgypt flagCanada → Egypt

Not applicable

Technical agreement; not new quantified investment

A signed technical cooperation agreement, not a new quantified capital investment.

2026 · Manufacturing

Planned investment

Avelon → East Port Said

Canada flagEgypt flagCanada → Egypt

US$27m planned

Signed project agreement; not deployed capital

Technical-textiles project agreement; value is planned investment, not verified money deployed.

Counting rule: only completed capital transactions qualify as completed investments. A licence, affiliate institution, partnership agreement or blocked purchase is evidence of commercial engagement, not necessarily capital deployed. Deal values are not summed.

06 / The economic scorecard

Who holds each advantage
today?

Ten comparisons. Each lead applies only to its own measure; the point is to identify practical leverage.

No overall winner.
Each side brings a different advantage.

Canada’s edge

Scale & capability

Economic size, GDP per person, innovation and selected capital measures.

Egypt’s edge

Population & momentum

Larger population and faster recorded GDP growth for the selected period.

The ten measures cover size, market, momentum, price stability, trade, innovation and capital. GDP, population and GDP per capita are related, so they are not independent votes. No ranking or aggregate winner is inferred.

10 aspects shown

Read in groups: economic scale (GDP, population, GDP per person); conditions (growth, inflation); bilateral trade (goods, services); capabilities (innovation); global capital position (inward and outward FDI). These comparisons indicate leverage, not identical types of advantage.

Economic size

GDP

Canada

Larger economy

CA Canada: US$2.32 trillionEG Egypt: US$365.25 billion

2025

Why this finding? ↓

Market size

Population

Egypt

Larger population

CA Canada: 41.65 millionEG Egypt: 118.37 million

2025

Why this finding? ↓

Economic output

GDP per person

Canada

Higher GDP/head

CA Canada: US$55,697.66EG Egypt: US$3,085.81

2025

Why this finding? ↓

Price stability

Consumer inflation

Canada

Lower inflation

CA Canada: 2.07%EG Egypt: 14.07%

2025

Why this finding? ↓

Bilateral goods

Goods exports to partner

Canada

Higher goods sales

CA Canada → Egypt: C$536.6 millionEG Egypt → Canada: approximately C$430.4 million

2025

Why this finding? ↓

Bilateral services

Services exports to partner

Canada

Higher services sales

CA Canada → Egypt: C$230 millionEG Egypt → Canada: approximately C$132 million

2024

Why this finding? ↓

Innovation

WIPO innovation rank

Canada

Higher GII rank

CA Canada: 16thEG Egypt: 83rd

2026

Why this finding? ↓

Capital attracted

Global inward FDI stock

Canada

Larger global stock

CA Canada: US$1,818.788 billionEG Egypt: US$205.243 billion

2024 · historical baseline

Why this finding? ↓

Comparable 2024 primary-source baseline

Capital abroad

Global outward FDI stock

Canada

Larger global stock

CA Canada: US$2,792.899 billionEG Egypt: US$10.089 billion

2024 · historical baseline

Why this finding? ↓

Comparable 2024 primary-source baseline

Figures and interpretations use their own stated years. Global FDI stocks do not describe bilateral investment.

GDP · Canada2025 · World Bank country data.

Canada: US$2.32 trillion · Egypt: US$365.25 billion.

World Bank, 2025. Nominal GDP at current exchange rates describes economic output, not household welfare.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
Population · Egypt2025 · World Bank country series.

Canada: 41.65 million · Egypt: 118.37 million.

World Bank, 2025. Larger population indicates market scale, not purchasing power or disposable income.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
GDP per person · Canada2025 · World Bank country series.

Canada: US$55,697.66 · Egypt: US$3,085.81.

World Bank, 2025. Nominal GDP per person is not median income; exchange-rate effects matter.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
Real GDP growth · Egypt2025 · World Bank reported figures.

Canada: 1.74% · Egypt: 4.39%.

World Bank, 2025, annual real GDP growth. Faster growth does not imply larger absolute output.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
Consumer inflation · Canada2025 · World Bank country series.

Canada: 2.07% · Egypt: 14.07%.

World Bank, 2025, consumer-price inflation. Lower is used here only as a price-stability advantage.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
Goods exports to partner · Canada2025 · Global Affairs Canada bilateral trade reporting.

Canada → Egypt: C$536.6 million · Egypt → Canada: approximately C$430.4 million.

Global Affairs Canada, 2025 merchandise exports. Egypt figure = C$967.0m two-way goods less C$536.6m Canadian exports; rounded estimate, not an independently published exact value.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
Services exports to partner · Canada2024 · Global Affairs Canada bilateral trade reporting.

Canada → Egypt: C$230 million · Egypt → Canada: approximately C$132 million.

Global Affairs Canada, 2024 services exports. Egyptian value = C$362m two-way total less C$230m Canadian exports; a different reference year from merchandise.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
WIPO innovation rank · Canada2026 · WIPO GII.

Canada: 16th · Egypt: 83rd.

WIPO Global Innovation Index 2026. A lower ordinal means a higher innovation ranking; rankings are not a measure of bilateral business outcomes.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
Global inward FDI stock · Canada2024 · UNCTAD WIR 2025 fact sheets.

Canada: US$1,818.788 billion · Egypt: US$205.243 billion.

UNCTAD World Investment Report 2025 country fact sheets, 2024 inward FDI stock. A worldwide accumulated position, not bilateral Canada–Egypt capital; retained as a fixed historical baseline because the authoritative source and period match.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card
Global outward FDI stock · Canada2024 · UNCTAD WIR 2025 fact sheets.

Canada: US$2,792.899 billion · Egypt: US$10.089 billion.

UNCTAD World Investment Report 2025 country fact sheets, 2024 outward FDI stock. A worldwide accumulated position, not bilateral invested capital; retained as a fixed historical baseline rather than mixed with another vintage.

Source ↗↑ Return to this card

07 / From advantage to action

Three directions.
One question: where is the value?

Three distinct destinations. Choose the market where value will be earned, then inspect the participants, conditions and success test in the next section.

Can Canada and Egypt turn their economic advantages into a much larger investment partnership?

01

Canada → Egypt

Build in Egypt

Destination: Egypt

Canadian participation in Egyptian demand-led projects → local operating capacity

See how it works ↓

02

Egypt → Canada

Grow in Canada

Destination: Canada

Egyptian-led exports, market entry and investments → paying Canadian customers

See how it works ↓

03

Canada + Egypt → other markets

Compete together

Destination: third-country buyers

Canada–Egypt workshare or production partnership → contracted third-market sales

See how it works ↓

These are strategic routes to explore, not forecasts or claims that specific investments have been secured.

08 / Participation & outcomes

Make each direction
work commercially.

Each route needs an actual customer, a commercial proposition, risk allocation and a measurable outcome.

01

Canada → Egypt

Build in Egypt

Turn complementary capabilities into productive capacity.

Where to start

Start with a buyer-backed industrial, energy-service or education proposal; verify demand, licensing and financial viability before committing capital.

Shared leverage

Canadian technology, finance, industrial expertise and commercial relationships.

Who participates

Egyptian manufacturers, project owners, Canadian firms, capital providers and local partners.

Value for both sides

Egypt gains output, jobs and skills; Canadian participants gain contracts and agreed returns.

What needs to happen

Demand, permits, financing, pricing and clear ownership.

Success test

Plant output, paid orders, deployed capital and net returns.

Historical context. Methanex Damietta is an operating precedent, not evidence every sector will succeed.
↑ Compare the three routes
02

Egypt → Canada

Grow in Canada

Build sustainable Egyptian commercial presence in Canada.

Where to start

Test a Canadian distribution agreement, anchor-customer contract or regulated acquisition thesis before entering or investing.

Shared leverage

Canadian customers and counterparties, regulated asset markets and production opportunities.

Who participates

Egyptian entrepreneurs, buyers, Canadian partners, regulators and service firms.

Value for both sides

Egyptian firms gain access and commercial rights; Canada can gain supply, jobs and investment.

What needs to happen

Market fit, compliance, capital, customer acquisition and realistic costs.

Success test

Customer retention, recurring revenue, employment and realised returns.

Historical context. WIND Mobile shows access is possible, while Allstream illustrates regulatory risk.
↑ Compare the three routes
03

Canada + Egypt → other markets

Compete together

Win profitable work beyond either home market.

Where to start

Identify a named third-country buyer or tender, then test workshare, origin rules, delivery economics and enforceable IP rights.

Shared leverage

Complementary technology, production costs, local access and partner networks.

Who participates

Exporters, manufacturers, contractors, investors and third-market customers.

Value for both sides

Both gain paid work and defined shares of IP, revenue and profit.

What needs to happen

Signed workshare, jurisdictional access, delivery capacity and enforceable terms.

Success test

Contracts won, project margins, royalties and retained income.

Historical context. Avelon’s planned export-oriented industrial project suggests a route; execution remains unproven.
↑ Compare the three routes

Explore investment pathways

Use the 168 Canada investment pathways as a starting point—not as a limit on bilateral opportunities.

Explore pathways →

Explore strategic advisory

Strategic guidance for CEOs, boards and government decision makers evaluating growth and investment partnerships.

Explore advisory →

Classification rule: assign each opportunity once, by its primary paying market—Egypt, Canada or a specified third country. A jointly owned factory in Egypt belongs to the Egypt route unless its defining opportunity is a contracted third-market sale.

09 / Who could benefit?

Who benefits—and how?

Four distinct channels connect commercial activity with real people, businesses, capital and public value.

01 / Workers

Paid work.
Useful skills.

What could be gained

Wages, employment and training from operating opportunities.

What it could lead to

Transferable expertise and potential longer-term earning power.

What needs to happen

Viable demand, local hiring and relevant training.

Net earnings and employability

Count jobs and wage earnings separately from enterprise profit; distinguish gross jobs announced from jobs actually sustained.

02 / Businesses

Contracts today.
Customers tomorrow.

What could be gained

Income from products, professional services and supply agreements.

What it could lead to

Reference customers, distribution and repeat contracts.

What needs to happen

Competitive pricing, delivery capacity and collections.

Sales and operating results

Measure paid sales, margins and contractual rights; do not treat gross sales as profit.

03 / Investors

Returns from
productive assets.

What could be gained

Dividends, interest or capital gains; losses are also possible.

What it could lead to

The ability to finance further viable ventures.

What needs to happen

Clear rights, risk allocation and net cash returns.

Distributable net returns

Measure realised net returns after costs and funding obligations; do not add distributions again to business profit.

04 / Public & communities

Useful infrastructure.
Net public value.

What could be gained

Service access, local infrastructure and eligible taxes or royalties.

What it could lead to

Local productive capacity and public investment returns if properly governed.

What needs to happen

Subtract public costs, liabilities and maintenance before claiming net benefit.

Public value, net of costs

Report taxes, royalties and qualifying savings distinctly from public ownership returns; subtract associated public expenditure.

Do not add these channels together. One transaction can fund wages, business margins, dividends and taxes. Count each cash flow at the correct level once.

Avoid double counting: wages are a cost to the business and income to workers; investor distributions come from business cash flows, not an additional layer of output; taxes are transfers to the public sector, not extra production. Report each measure at its own level, net of relevant costs.

10 / The wider investment & wealth case

Investment creates activity.
Retained value builds wealth.

More trade alone does not create public wealth. Long-term value depends on viable production, ownership rights and what remains after costs.

01

Build productive business

Projects, customers and joint ventures in Canada, Egypt or third markets.

02

Identify who receives the value

Private participants

Count profit, wages and returns only after attributable costs.

Public participants

Count taxes, royalties, eligible savings and public ownership returns after costs.

03

Retain value under explicit rules

Only legitimate retained returns or eligible fiscal savings can support future capital accumulation.

The wider Canada investment argument

This relationship is one possible contribution, not a quantified fund inflow.

Separate author scenario

C$3T by 2040

An author-modelled Canadian national wealth scenario—not a confirmed forecast or Canada–Egypt investment target.

Direct investment is not automatically public wealth. The same commercial value must never be counted again as separate public wealth.

11 / From opportunity to execution

What happens next?

Start with the strongest proven connection, test its commercial potential and measure actual value delivered.

Timings are author estimates, not official deadlines. Stages can overlap and large projects may take longer.

Choose real opportunities

Name an investable project, customer or commercial gap.

Responsible participantsCompanies, project sponsors, buyers
Estimated timingWeeks 1–4

Evidence of progress

Named project, buyer evidence, accountable lead.

Test feasibility and access

Assess cash flows, regulation, permissions and market entry.

Responsible participantsCommercial teams, investors, legal specialists
Estimated timingMonths 1–3

Evidence of progress

Feasibility and go / no-go decision.

Agree contributions and rewards

Negotiate capital, IP, contracts, risk and ownership.

Responsible participantsSponsors, lenders, partner companies
Estimated timingMonths 2–6

Evidence of progress

Signed terms and committed sources.

Prove delivery

Complete a pilot, first sale, or operating financing close.

Responsible participantsOwners, suppliers, delivery partners
Estimated timingMonths 3–12+

Evidence of progress

Paid contract, operating milestone or closed finance.

Measure net retained value

Track sales, operating margins, actual deployment and net benefits in both countries.

Responsible participantsOperators, investors, public bodies
Estimated timingQuarterly after launch

Evidence of progress

Auditable results after costs and liabilities.

12 / The answer

Leverage the history.
Build the next opportunity.

The evidence supports a real bilateral foundation, not a guaranteed size of future returns.

The central question · answered

Can Canada and Egypt turn their economic advantages into a much larger investment partnership?

Yes, a substantial historical foundation exists. The scale of the next opportunity will depend on selecting real demand, viable investment and complementary strengths.

Build on operating industrial experience, business relationships and institutional protections. Expand productive capacity, win customers across borders and develop joint ventures where both sides have enforceable rights to the value created.

Trade is activity, not automatically retained wealth. The contribution to either country’s long-term wealth must be measured after costs and verified ownership.

Revisit the three routes ↑

Appendix / Inspect the evidence

Sources, definitions
and calculations.

Source records are preserved for scrutiny. Unconfirmed totals, plan values and cross-year sums are not reported as achieved bilateral investment.

Data definitions and publication controls

  • 2025 World Bank figures are used for GDP, population, GDP per capita, growth and inflation; 2025 Canadian bilateral goods trade, 2024 bilateral services trade, and 2026 WIPO rankings are labelled separately.
  • UNCTAD 2024 worldwide inward and outward investment stocks are a consistent, source-verifiable historical snapshot. UNCTAD has released a newer 2025 annex; do not describe these 2024 values as current stock or add them to historical deal values.
  • Bilateral transaction values are not cumulative bilateral investment holdings; completed acquisitions, exploration licences, cooperation and future project commitments carry different statuses.
  • At first publication, add an actual datePublished timestamp and the real hosted social-image URL; this draft is marked noindex until deployed.

How to read the comparisons

  • Each scorecard lead refers to one measure and one period; there is no sum of wins.
  • FDI positions (stocks) differ from annual flows; both differ from deal announcements.
  • Country of investor, company incorporation and location of productive assets need not match.
  • Trade totals are annual flows and do not equal profit or accumulated wealth.
  • C$ = Canadian dollars; US$ = US dollars; m = million; bn = billion. No historic deal values are summed.
  • Strategic routes, benefits and indicative timetables are analysis—not official forecasts.
  • Trend charts: bilateral merchandise flows use the official Canadian Global Affairs Canada customs-based 2024–2025 goods trade amounts in C$ millions, rounded from the 2025 trade review; the earlier ten-year historical chart was withdrawn because the complete primary dataset could not be confirmed. The worldwide FDI trend uses World Bank inward net FDI as a share of GDP for each country, 2016–2025; these flows originate from all foreign investors, not only the bilateral partner. Rounding applies.